Showing posts with label quirky romantic comedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quirky romantic comedy. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

ALL ABOUT STEVE, All About Eh

I made a cardinal mistake this past weekend. I'd read the script for ALL ABOUT STEVE a few years ago. I wasn't too impressed. And yet, looking for a movie over the long holiday weekend, the girlfriend and I settled on ALL ABOUT STEVE. If I didn't like the script, odds were, it wouldn't turn into a great movie all of a sudden (although that has happened twice -- MR. AND MRS. SMITH and LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE).

ALL ABOUT SPOILERS BELOW















ABS tells the story of crossword constructor Mary Horowitz (Sandra Bullock), a 30-something weirdo who lives with her parents. When her parents set her up on a blind date with news cameraman Steve (Bradley Cooper), she's instantly smitten and jumps him in his truck before they can even pull away from the curb. Steve realizes she's a bit odd, but not before politely telling her it's too bad she can't join him on the road. After she gets fired from her job for making an all-Steve crossword puzzle, she sets out to stalk her crush.

There are several obvious problems with the film/script. First, the movie plays out on one level throughout. Mary stalks Steve. She seems to like him solely because he's attractive. We know he doesn't like her -- he finds her annoying. So we're not rooting for the two of them to get together. We don't think Steve will ever come around to liking her, and he doesn't. He just warms up slightly from thinking she's a nutjob to thinking she's quirky. So the whole film's about Mary catching up to reality and learning that Steve's not the guy for her. Which everyone else seems to know from the start. Romantic comedies that work are about people we want to see get together overcoming difficult obstacles in order to wind up together. You have to root for the two of them as a couple. Here, we don't. We're not even supposed to.

There could have been some interesting ways to tweak the premise so the movie actually worked and held some mystery. You could've had Mary changing to attract Steve, and then realizing that she shouldn't have to change for love. But the movie just has her be her weird self throughout. Or, you could've done the movie from Steve's point-of-view, with him as the main character. He sleeps with a girl he thinks is great, and she turns out to be certifiable. She stalks him and puts his life and job in danger (one of the film's funny moments is when Steve mistakes a piece of a car for a machete and thinks Mary's trying to kill him). But the film doesn't really have Steve's job in danger, at least not from Mary. And we know Mary's not trying to kill him.

Second, there are no real obstacles to the film. Mary follows Steve around the country. She hits what could be an obstacle -- a hurricane, which trashes her car. But for some reason, even though the car's just flown a mile in the air, it's driveable. In fact, there are no obstacles at all until the very end of the movie, when Mary falls in a mine.

Third, Mary finds a group of weirdos whom she hangs out with and finds her place with. But they're such mutants, it's a little off-putting. One of them is DJ Qualls, usually cast when the filmmakers are going for a grotesque -- and he's made even weirder by the fact that he carves apples into faces for a living. Really? Mary may talk too much, but she's smart, and she's played by Sandra Bullock (even if she has awful clothes and a bad dye-job). Can't she find some non-freaks to feel at home amongst?

The film works in brief moments -- Mary falling in the well, the gag with the "machete," Thomas Haden Church screwing with Steve by continually telling Mary Steve's in love with her and wants her to follow him no matter what he might say to the contrary. But overall, there's nothing driving the story. Because it's a movie about a delusional woman coming to a very obvious realization -- that this isn't the man for her.

Oh, it's also not believable that a guy is going to blow off sex with an attractive woman just because she's talky. In order for a guy to really leave Sandra Bullock on the side of the road instead of schtupping her, she's have to have a penis or something. And still...

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Video Corner - GIGANTIC, Gigantic Disappointment

Ah, the quirky indie romantic comedy. There've been good ones throughout film history (ANNIE HALL, THE GRADUATE, I even enjoyed most of GARDEN STATE). And then there are the ones that seem to just be quirky for quirky's sake (500 DAYS OF SUMMER). GIGANTIC falls squarely into the latter category.

BIG-ASS SPOILERS BELOW













GIGANTIC tells the tale of Paul Dano's Brian Weathersby. We're introduced to Dano visiting his friend doing experiments on rats in a lab. Then he gets the crap beaten out of him by a crazy homeless guy. Then he goes to his job, selling high-end mattresses, where obnoxious millionaire John Goodman comes in to buy one. Later, he sends his daughter, Happy (yes, happy) to pick up the mattress. She falls asleep on the bed for hours. Happy and Brian start dating, or more specifically, start having sex in odd places. Brian's dream since he was a little child was to adopt a Chinese baby, something he's on a waiting list for. He hangs out with his elderly father and brothers, taking mushrooms and gathering wild mushrooms in a field. He's shot at, then shot, by the homeless guy. He eats a fancy French dinner. He gets approved for a baby. He stabs and kills the homeless guy, who turns out to be a figment of his imagination. Happy gets freaked out and breaks up with him. And some more stuff happens.

This movie was highly annoying, despite the fact that Zooey Deschanel gets completely nude in it. I have no idea why anyone in it, including Deschanel, Goodman, Dano, even Ed Asner, wanted to be in it. It's just plain weird. The protagonist is an oddball, the love interest is an oddball, and there's absolutely nothing driving the movie. It's not the story of a guy who had a jacked-up family, so he has to do whatever he can to provide a home for his incoming baby. It's not about how a woman comes to find the man she loves in the most unexpected of ways and how she gets the family she's not looking for. Things just happen for no reason whatsoever.

Why does Brian sell weird mattresses? Why is he taking drugs with his family? Why does he want a Chinese baby (he's wanted one since he was 7 is not a good backstory or proper motivation)? About the only thing that happens that makes any sense is that Happy freaks out and breaks up with Brian because it's too much too fast. But then she comes around again later anyway, having seemingly changed her mind for no discernible reason.

The film's filled with some truly unique scenes and characters, but none of them are grounded in any sort of coherent reality. There's no throughline to the plot, just a bunch of stuff happening. And the whole subplot with the homeless guy and Brian's imagination is odd and jarring. If he's insane, this guy shouldn't have a baby.

It's one thing to do an unconventional take on a romantic comedy. New characters provide a new perspective, and interesting settings and plot turns can tweak stale genre tropes. But you can't just make a movie where everything's weird, there's no logic behind anything, and the film's just a collection of oddness slapped together on the editing table. Well, I guess you can, but what you get is GIGANTIC.